EU taxes for flying Ryanair to Marbella, but not for playboys’ LearJets to Monaco

Not bad for some - Taxes for the many but not the few

Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2022

In that charming manner that only the EU Commission knows how, its proposals to introduce a new tax on aviation fuel continues its journey towards confirmation – without any news that it is yet prepared to abandon its plan to exempt private jets. The same basket of carbon tax proposals will also see taxes on fuel for vessels entering EU ports and, yes, you guessed it, there will be an exemption for luxury yachts too.

When first announced last year the EU Commission’s proposals caused laughter and consternation in equal measure. How thoughtless, how out of touch, how elitist could the EU Commission be, that it would introduce a tax for passengers flying Ryanair and Easyjet from EU airports but not for a billionaire hopping on the company Learjet or Embraer on route to board the floating gin palace in Monaco?

One would be forgiven for thinking such crass behaviour is in the EU’s DNA, that to be so aloof and so unaware of how bad it looks is a pre-requisite for becoming a Commissioner.

First announced by the Commission on 14th July 2021, the measures were part of the EU’s ambitious targets to reduce emissions by at least 55 percent by 2030 compared to the 1990 level, in its attempt to make Europe the first climate neutral continent by 2050.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

Exemptions for the wealthiest while new EU energy taxes hit ordinary people

  • Taxes on intra-EU commercial flights for all passengers
  • No taxes on private jet flights
  • Taxes on all shipping by vessels over 5,000 gross tonnes
  • No taxes on luxury yachts because of their weight

Aviation sector

The manner in which the aviation fuel tax will be introduced is to phase out the free emission allowances which the aviation sector currently enjoys under the existing Energy Taxation Directive.

It is proposed the resulting levy would apply from 2023 across all member states, increasing gradually over 10 years until the full rate is reached. If it were not for the Covid pandemic the tax was likely to be levied in full by 2026.

The rules promote the blending of ‘sustainable aviation fuels’, known as e-fuels, into existing jet fuel uploaded at EU airports. These measures are estimated to help cut aviation emissions by up to 10%. The levy will be expressed in euros per gigajoule, the rate depending on energy content. It is believed the taxes will only be applied on intra-EU flights.

The loophole arises because the EU taxes will not apply to cargo-only flights or to “business aviation” which includes recreational use of an aircraft or a company using a plane for a business purpose – although members states will be allowed to levy their own tax on these categories if they wish. As private jets are usually the domain of the most wealthy, with flights being chartered by a business or tax-efficient company, the outcome will be that EU-based holidaymakers will be taxed for flying to Marbella but millionaires won’t when flying to Monaco.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

EU's top priority: "The European Green Deal"

“It is our opportunity to write history. Even more, it is our duty to act now.”

“Europe with its European Green Deal will spare no effort to become the first climate neutral continent. But at this COP, we all must speed up our race to net zero.”

Ursula von der Leyen, EU Commission President, at COP26 UN Climate Change Conference Glasgow, 01 Nov 2021

In 2016 - the UK's Referendum year - the EU Commission held a public consultation on market-based measures to reduce the climate change impact from international aviation. The consultation sought input on both global and EU policy options. In total, only 85 citizens and organisations responded.

Maritime sector

Under the same proposals of last year, the maritime sector would see itself brought under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) from 2023, phased in over a three-year period. The EU’s proposals will be negotiated in Brussels this year but currently include an exemption for vessels below a 5,000 gross tonnage. Rather than using a system of vessel category, the gross weight was chosen – which is vague enough to create loopholes. This means not just fishing boats but yachts of all sizes and types will be exempt.

A study by Environmental group Transport & Environment said the loopholes would result in some 25.8 million tonnes of CO2 not falling under the ETS. Roughly 20% of the 130 million tonnes emitted annually by shipping in the bloc would be excluded.

The EU’s own estimates suggest that ships below the 5,000 GT threshold account for around 45% of vessels that call into EU ports but only around 10% of the emissions that would otherwise be liable for the levy. Ship owners will have to buy permits for their vessels if they pollute or face bans from EU ports.

Reaction

The trade body representing major European carriers, Airlines for Europe, said the EU’s policies threatened the competitiveness of airlines and the tourism industry and warned airlines could end up paying twice for emissions through overlapping measures. Member states will retain discretion whether or not to tax the fuel of private jets on a national basis.

The study conducted by environmental campaigners T&E estimated that the 20% of the EU’s maritime emissions of 130m tonnes per annum that would avoid taxation was equivalent to the output of Denmark.

The new regulations and taxes will not apply to the UK unless the British Government chooses to adopt a similar law. Had the UK agreed to dynamic alignment with the EU’s Single Market such a law would automatically have been applied after passing.

Observations

Another set of EU taxes that the UK will avoid – thanks to Brexit.

British punters will find they are flying to Marbella or Madrid, Benidorm or Budapest without these taxes – but passengers flying from Berlin or Bruges are. The purpose of the taxes is of course to discourage people travelling by air. So, of course, some environmental campaigners will claim the taxes are a good thing – fair enough – but let the British people decide for themselves, rather than have it imposed upon them as it would have been.

Political parties can put in their manifestos that they wish to have such environmental taxes and see if the public endorses them. Had we still been in EU, the unaccountable EU institutions would have squared-off a deal between reluctant countries so a tax would be introduced – and once introduced it would then gradually be raised.

The taxes are undeniably inequitable – a flight carrying 100s of passengers will have a low carbon emission per person – while a private jet carrying only a handful of people will have a very high carbon emission per person. Yet the latter goes untaxed. That cannot be right.

This madness is yet another bullet dodged, now amounting to a magazine or two, and there will be more to come as we keep looking for them.

Such hard work does not come cost free, however…

Facts4EU.Org needs you today

We are a 'not for profit' team (we make a loss) and any donation goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

We badly need more of our thousands of readers to donate. Could this be you, today? Maybe you've been thinking about it, but just haven't got around to doing it? If so, let us reassure you. It's quick and easy and we use two highly secure payment providers. And we do NOT ask you for further donations if you donate once - we just hope that you keep supporting us. Your donation stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

Please don't assume that other people will keep us going - we don't receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us?

Most of our readers are well-informed and appreciate our fact-based articles, presented in a way you won't see anywhere else. If you value reports like the one above, please help our work with a donation. We have far more to do in researching, publishing, campaigning and lobbying Parliament than we have in terms of the financial resources to fulfil these tasks. We badly need funding to continue - we rely 100% on public donations from readers like you.

If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please make a donation now. It’s quick, secure, and confidential, and you can use one of the links below or you can use our Donations page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 24 hours. Thank you for reading this.

[ Sources: EU sources & Reuters ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Wednesday 19 January, 2022

Click here to go to our news headlines

Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don't forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

Share this article on

Something to say about this? Scroll down for reader comments

Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

We think facts matter. Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

Any credit card user

Quick One-off

Donate

From £5 - £1,000

Monthly

Subscribe

From £3 per month

Paypal Users Only - Choose amount first

Quick One-off

Monthly